Information about the article

Article type:
Original article

Index UDK: 342.3

Year, Volume, Number:
2024, Vol. 12, № 3 (47)

Pages: 35-43

Download PDF

GLOBALIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC LEGAL CONCEPT AND GENESIS OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY

Anastasia D. Gned
Applicant, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya street, Penza, 440026, Russia, a191199@gmail.com

EDN: DIVIFE
DOI: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-4

Category: PUBLIC LEGAL (STATE LEGAL) SCIENCES

For citation:
Gned A.D. Globalization and its impact on the public legal concept and genesis of state sovereignty. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal "Nauka. Obshchestvo. Gosudarstvo" = Electronic scientific journal "Science. Society. State". 2024;12(3):35–43. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21685/2307-9525-2024-12-3-4

...................................

Received: 23.05.2024

Accepted: 30.07.2024
.......................................

Open access

Abstract
Background. In recent years, due to the upsurge in international tensions and the presence of military conflicts against the background of the third wave of globalization, state sovereignty tends to strengthen. In this regard, the article, which aims at studying the impact of globalization on the genesis and public legal concept of state sovereignty, seems very relevant. Materials and methods. The materials for this article are scientific works of Russian and foreign authors on the topic under study, legislative acts of various countries, international treaties and agreements. In the process of study the author combines the dialectical, systemic, historical analysis with subsequent synthesis, as well as historical and legal analysis. Results. In the process of globalization there are three waves: 1) 1870–1914; 2) 1950–1980; 3) began after the end of the bipolar world (1991) and lasts to the present day. The first wave of globalization virtually did not affect state sovereignty. The second wave initiated its transformation, and the third one led to the dilution of the concept of state sovereignty up to the conclusion of international agreements authorizing “humanitarian intervention”. Nowadays, due to the increasing international tensions and military conflicts, despite the ongoing globalization, there is a tendency to strengthening state sovereignty and returning its public legal concept to the classical canons. Conclusions. At present, against the backdrop of the upsurge in international tensions and military conflicts, the most economically developed countries in the world are striving to reinforce their state sovereignty. A new and extremely important aspect of state sovereignty in the context of confrontation has emerged, namely digital sovereignty. The trend towards returning the public-law concept of state sovereignty to classical canons is detected.

Keywords
globalization, state sovereignty, public legal concept, transformation, genesis

References
1. Osvetimskaya I.I. State sovereignty: Content and transformation in the context of globalization. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie = Proceedings of Higher Education Institution. Law. 2017;(2):150–167. (In Russ.)
2. Nikonov V.A., Voronov A.S., Sazhina V.A., Volodenkov S.V., Rybakova M.V. Digital sovereignty of a modern state: Content and structural components (case study of expert research). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2021;(60):206–216. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17223/1998863X/60/18
3. Shestopal S.S., Turyanskaya E.S. Classical and postclassical interpretations of state sovereignty: traditions vs. modern political and legal discourse. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal = Baltic Journal of the Humanities. 2019;8(3):231–235. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26140/bgz3-2019-0803-0058
4. Marchenko M.N. On the main trends in the development of law in the context of globalization. Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and Law. 2009;(6):5–11. (In Russ.)
5. Rosenboim O. State, power and global order. International Relations. 2019;33(2):229–245. doi: 10.1177/0047117819840803
6. Philpott D. Westphalia, authority, and international society. Political Studies. 1999;47(3):566–589. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00217
7. Christopher W. Hughes, Yew Meng Lai (ed.) Security Studies. London: Routledge, 2011:472. doi: 10.4324/9780203422144
8. Bredikhin A.L., Pereverzev E.A. Emergence and development of the idea of state sovereignty. Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni I.D. Putilina = Bulletin of I. D. Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2009;(1):85–87. (In Russ.)
9. Machiavelli N. Gosudar. Per. s ital. G.D. Muravevoy; avt. vstup. st., primech. R.I. Khlodovskiy, primech. M.L. Andreeva = The Sovereign. Translation from Italian by G.D. Muravyova; introduction, notes by R.I. Khlodovsky, notes by M.L. Andreev. Moscow: Ripol Klassik, 2016:462. (In Russ.)
10. Boden Zh. Six books on the Republic. Book 6. Chapter 6. On censorship. Translation from French, introduction and notes by G. I. Bayazitova, N. N. Lykova, D. S. Mityureva. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki = Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2022;6(1):339–368. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17323/2587-8719-2022-1-339-368
11. Grotius H. Hugonis Grotii De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres. Vol. 3. Lausannae: Sumptibus Bousquet, 1752:689.
12. HobbesT. Leviafan. Per. s angl. A. Gutermana = Leviathan. Translation from English by A. Guterman. Moscow: Ripol Klassik, 2017:606. (In Russ.)
13. Spinoza B. Politicheskiy traktat. Per. S. Rogovin = Political treatise. Translation by S. Rogovin. Moscow: Yurayt, 2018:278. (In Russ.)
14. Bossuet J.B. Discours sur l'histoire universelle. Paris: Renouard, 1921:428. doi: 10.15122/ISBN.978-2-8124-2803-6
15. Montesquieu Ch.L. O dukhe zakonov = On the spirit of laws. Moscow: Azbuka, 2023:832. (In Russ.)
16. Rousseau J.-J. Ob obshchestvennom dogovore: traktaty = The social contract: Works. Moscow: Kanon-press-Ts: Kuchkovo pole, 1998:414. (In Russ.)
17. Kant I. Osnovopolozheniya metafiziki nravov = Fundamentals of the metaphysics of morals. Moscow: Direkt-Media, 2002:164. (In Russ.)
18. Hegel G.W.F. Filosofiya prava = Philosophy of law. Moscow: Mysl, 1990:524. (In Russ.)
19. Marchenko M.N. State sovereignty: Problems of defining the concept and content. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie = Proceedings of Higher Education Institution. Law. 2003;(1):186–197. (In Russ.)
20. Hoffmann S. An American social science: international relations (1977). International Theory: Critical Investigations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1995:212–241. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_9
21. Wendt A. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press, 2015:354. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316005163
22. Gordon G. Digital sovereignty, digital infrastructures, and quantum horizons. AI & Society. 2024;39(1):125–137. doi: 10.1007/s00146-023-01729-7
23. Bondar N.S., Amelin R.V., Artemova D.I., Velieva D.S. et al. Ekonomicheskoe pravo: uchebnik = Economic law: Textbook. Moscow: Prospekt, 2021:352. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31085/9785392336791-2021-352
24. Romanovskiy G.B., Romanovskaya O.V. On digital sovereignty. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe parvo = Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2022;(9):25–31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/1812-3767-2022-9-25-31

Дата создания: 18.07.2024 18:37
Дата обновления: 03.09.2024 20:09